"Mediation:
It Can Help Families"
By
M. Brady Mikusko, MA, MSW
“I moved out. We
agreed we would work things out with the kids and the money. Three
months later the only people still speaking were our attorneys. I
don’t know how it happened…. I tried, really tried to talk to her.…
We got into horrible fights every time we tried to discuss it.… I
was afraid I was going to lose everything if I didn’t do something.
I really tried to work with her. She just wouldn’t. I had to call my
attorney. I feel very bad about how things went.”
“I wanted to stay on friendly terms for the kids’
sake. They need both of us. He was angry that it was taking me so
long to find a job.… He couldn’t understand. I tried to explain that
I needed more time.… We couldn’t talk about it any more.… My friends
said I deserved spousal support. I felt my survival was at stake. I
had no choice. I didn’t think it would turn out like this. There’s
terrible tension between
us now. It is not good for the children.”
– Excerpted from Between Love and Hate,
by Lois Gold, p. 3-4
Divorce does not
have to be like this. It can be different.
In fact, for the sake of the children, it must be different. Why? Because
the children who do not fare well in divorce are the ones whose
parents are hostile and fighting. All current research on children
and divorce unequivocally finds this to be the case. That is one
reason why more and more parents are choosing mediation, instead of
attorney-to-attorney negotiation or litigation, when faced with the
crisis of separation or divorce.
Mediation is
different from the conventional approach to divorce in many
significant ways. First and foremost, mediation sees parents as
joint decision makers – not opponents. It also sees the family as
the client and, in so doing, helps the parents focus on what is best
for their children, on what is best for their family. And herein
lies another important difference from the conventional approach to
divorce. Mediation recognizes the fact that the relationship between
the parents doesn’t end with divorce, and in fact, needs to be
supported and respected. The bottom-line is this: if parents compete
against each other and fight to win the kids, the house, the
pension, the bank accounts, and so forth, in their attorneys’ office
or in court itself, is it really possible to end the fight once the
divorce is final and work together for the sake of the children?
Current research on
children and divorce also documents that the children who do well
after the crisis of divorce are the ones who have two actively
involved parents in their lives. This does not necessarily mean
50/50 custody, but it does mean that children need enough time with
each parent so that they can have the opportunity to form a close,
real relationship with both. Mediators help parents develop such a
parenting plan.
So how does
mediation work? In mediation, two parties meet voluntarily and
face-to-face, in the presence of a neutral, trained mediator, to
discuss the issues that must be resolved. (If face-to-face meetings
are unproductive, the mediator may meet with the parties
separately.) The meetings are usually in an informal and private
setting. In these meetings, the mediator first of all helps the
parties identify issues. In a divorce case, those issues would
include custody, visitation, division of property, and support. In a
case where parents are in conflict after the divorce is final, the
issues might be: changing the times that the children are with each
parent, deciding which school the children should go to, and so
forth. The mediator also helps the parties identify their needs,
some of which are shared, some of which are competing. The mediator
provides information to the couple as needed, works with them to
develop options, and assists them in their negotiations. The
mediator does not make decisions for the couple. Rather, it is the
couple who is in charge of the decisions. The end result is
a series of agreements which speak to both of their needs.
Contrary to what one
might think, lawyers are very much a part of the mediation process
and each client is strongly encouraged to retain one. The lawyers
serve as consultants to their client, since issues will come up for
which the couple will need legal information. Further, the lawyers
will review the agreements, informing their client if he or she is
agreeing to something that is not in his or her best
interest. Lastly, it is the lawyers who take the agreements through
the court process.
Mediation is
short-term, generally lasting 2-3 months with an average of 4-6
sessions (1½ hours long). Fees are billed at an hourly rate, with
different mediators charging different rates. Mediated divorces
usually cost less than conventional divorces even with two
lawyer-consultants. The reason for this seems to be that
communication in mediation is direct, i.e., a couple talks to each
other rather than through their attorneys, and there is less need
for lawyers to engage in expensive legal procedures.
In closing,
mediation is a process which is available all over the county, state
and country. It is not an answer for every situation or for every
couple. But it is also not just for the “perfect” couple (i.e.,
where both want the divorce, communicate well and have no hard
feelings). Mediation is appropriate for the vast majority of
couples.
|